Andy Borowitz is a
blogger on the New Yorker responsible
for the Borowitz Report, a special
segment that focuses on social—and particularly political—satire. His blogs
have a generally liberal tendency, although he does criticize Democrats as
well. He draws caricatures of politicians’ reasoning to emphasize the ridiculousness
of certain policies. In emulation of his style, which is snarky and irreverent,
I’m commenting on the recent reversal of Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) on gay
marriage. (I’m using slightly less sarcasm—wit, to some people—only because it
sometimes becomes inappropriate for a high school journalism class.)
Republican Senator
Rob Portman’s sudden reversal on gay marriage (from support of the Defense of
Marriage Act to deciding that equality should
exist for everyone, regardless of sexual orientation—and his specific epiphany that
homosexual people did not choose their orientation) is a baby step in the right
direction, although an underwhelming and accidental one. In his op-ed, in which
he acknowledges much of the same arguments (14th Amendment rights, common-sense
social equality rhetoric, etc.) that others championing gay rights have long put
forth, he notably makes no move to repudiate his past logic, which upheld the
Defense of Marriage Act on the grounds that homosexuality was unnatural.
His son’s coming
out seems to be not only a catalyst for his moving toward fundamental equality
in policy but also the only real argument supporting his newfound position. He
talks extensively about wanting his middle son to have all the same
opportunities as his two other children. What about the fundamental right of
every other person in the LGBTQ community to have the same rights as everyone
else? Hypocrisy doesn’t seem to be absent from his reversal of position.
Regardless, he does push LGBTQ rights forward, although only by happenstance.
Katherine Fang
Staff writer (Editor-in-chief)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.